USPTO serial 76203232
YU-GI-OH!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YU-GI-OH!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing images and music that are downloaded through computer networks, and providing games played through cellular telephone communication; providing computer game programs, images and music that are downloaded through cellular telephone communication, and providing amusement arcade with game facilities; amusement arcades and centers; rental of computer game programs, arcade game machine and providing facilities for recreation activities, namely, amusement arcades and amusement parks; entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of game shows, events featuring voice artists; educational services, namely, conducting classes and workshops in the field of training referees for card game contests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |