USPTO serial 76203244
ACITAPE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2003
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACITAPE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nairobi, KE
Nairobi, KE
Nairobi, KE
LASCELLES, ST. JAMES, BB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A SEBOLT
JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTAEGIS TWR4940 MUNSON ST NWCANTON, OH 44718-3615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ADHESIVE TAPE FOR SCHOOL, HOME AND OFFICE USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHANDARIA, Sachen
- Other trademarks owned by CHANDARIA, Sachen
- Other trademarks owned by CHANDARIA, Sachen
- Other trademarks owned by KITARU INNOVATIONS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ACITAPE TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |