USPTO serial 76203769
THE WIRELESS CONVERGENCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 5, 2002
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE WIRELESS CONVERGENCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chanley T. Howell
CHANLEY T HOWELL ESQ FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 500 3000 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design of semiconductor chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ashvattha Semiconductor, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ashvattha Semiconductor, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SPECTRA WIRELESS INC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE WIRELESS CONVERGENCE COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |