USPTO serial 76203851
ADVANCED SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCED SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
ANDREW N SPIVAK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP1650 TYSONS BLVD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22102-3915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business planning services, namely, industry-resource planning for others; outsourcing services for others in the field of computer services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, software consulting, systems integration, and computer programming in the nature of turnkey solutions services, and implementing e-business platforms for others by web site design and development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |