Drawing for SALT LAKE PETRIFIED SNOWBALL

USPTO serial 76203950

SALT LAKE PETRIFIED SNOWBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALT LAKE PETRIFIED SNOWBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn G. Foster

LYNN G FOSTER FOSTER & FOSTER LC602 E 300 SSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84102-2104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Decorative balls formed of polyurethane and sodium chlorideACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 2, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance