Drawing for GSTP

USPTO serial 76204058

GSTP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GSTP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT E. BUSHNELL

Robert E. Bushnell Robert E. Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street, N.W., Suite 600Washington, DC 20006-1004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized database managementACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, the provision of global post-trade services, namely, pre-settlement matching for securities transactions used by investment managers, broker/dealers and global custodians, for matching of securities transaction to facilitate the settlement of cross-border securities transactions; providing a computer database in the field of cross-border securities transactions, in particular equity and fixed income securities transactions, on a post-trade, pre-settlement basisACTIVE—
042Database development services for others; computer software design for others; maintenance of computer software for others; Non-downloadable software in the field of the facilitation of cross-border securities transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 20021.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 24, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Sep 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance