USPTO serial 76204141
YAHOO!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YAHOO!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Heinze
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic products, namely, clock radios, audio cassette players, audio cassette recorders, calculators, walkie talkies, electronic key rings and key chains, voice changing devices, namely, electronic voice changers used to alter the sound of a person's voice, computer chip based recording/playback machines for recording and playing back digital audio files, image projectors, and electronic anti-intrusion room alarms | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys and games, namely, handheld units for playing electronic games, electronic game equipment for playing video games, electronic games, namely, electronic trivia games, electronic language translators, electronic banks, electronic toy candy dispensers and novelty items, namely, stuffed animals, toys, and handheld devices containing candy, interactive plush toys, radio-controlled toys, and radio-controlled toy vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |