Drawing for ADVERTISING IS NOT A GAME

USPTO serial 76204184

ADVERTISING IS NOT A GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVERTISING IS NOT A GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jan K Simpson

JAN K SIMPSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP1301 MCKINNEY STE 5100HOUSTON, TX 77010-3095UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a web site that allows business owners to request bids from and contract for advertising time from third party media providers, to select the medium for advertising, and to crate commercials and advertisements via an on-line electronic communications networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2003GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 19, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance