USPTO serial 76204187
WAMUINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAMUINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E Graybeal
LYNNE E GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Membership services, namely, roadside assistance referral services; membership services, namely, discount services that promote the goods and services of others for prescriptions, medical, insurance, pet insurance, accidental death insurance, accidental dismemberment insurance and dental and vision care; automotive club membership services; providing information and arranging for discounts on dining, hotel accommodations, travel and other leisure activities, and consumer merchandise; providing referrals for privacy protection products and services; providing information on privacy protection products and services, namely providing information in the field of investigative resources in response to consumer fraud and identity theft; providing information on privacy protection products and services, namely, providing information on monitoring credit inquiries and consumer credit reports and providing an alert as to any changes therein; providing information on and referrals for identity theft prevention products and services; providing a referral network for legal services; and providing the foregoing services electronically and via interactive websites by means of the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |