USPTO serial 76204253
DYNAMIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S McCoy
MICHAEL S MCCOY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP1301 MCKINNEY #5100HOUSTON, TX 77010-3095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automobiles and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |