USPTO serial 76204280
DECORS SONORES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DECORS SONORES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ProMusiCom, SNS (Societe en Nom Collectif)
Montreal, Quebec, H3M 2Z4, CA
Other trademarks owned by ProMusiCom, SNS (Societe en Nom Collectif)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene S. Stephens
EUGENE S STEPHENS EUGENE STEPHENS & ASSOCIATES56 WINDSOR STROCHESTER, NY 14605UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOUND RECORDING ANALOGICALLY OR DIGITALLY PRODUCED ON MECHANICAL SUPPORTS, NAMELY; COMPACT DISCS, TAPE CASSETTES AND ON ANY COMPUTER AUDIO FILES RECORDING SUPPORT CONTAINING ORIGINAL MUSIC AND/OR SOUND EFFECTS CLIPS AND/OR CUSTOMIZED AUDIO SOUNDTRACKS, FOR EXCLUSIVE OR NON-EXCLUSIVE LIMITED "ROYALTY FREE" INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL USES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |