USPTO serial 76204695
INVIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2003
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with INVIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
72461 Albstadt, DE
72461 Albstadt, DE
Albstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video and photographic cameras; computer software and computer hardware used to control and monitor the activity of special-purpose cameras, namely, cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Illuminating apparatus, namely, lighting used in connection with cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | [ repair of video and photographic cameras; repair of computer software and computer hardware used to control and monitor the activity of special-purpose cameras, namely, cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery; repair of illuminating apparatus, namely, lighting use in connection with cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Product development for others, namely, development of cameras, computer software and computer hardware used to control and monitor the activity of special-purpose cameras, namely, cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery; product development for others, namely, development of illuminating apparatus, namely, lighting used in connection with cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery; conducting fault and damage inspections of cameras, computer software and computer hardware used to control and monitor the activity of special-purpose cameras, namely, cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery; conducting fault and damage inspections of illuminating apparatus, namely, lighting used in connection with cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery; leasing of remote monitoring equipment, namely, cameras, computer software and computer hardware used to control and monitor the activity of special-purposes cameras, namely, cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery, and illuminating apparatus, namely, lighting used in connection with cameras for use in the remote visual inspection of the operation of machinery ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zaar, Kersten
- Other trademarks owned by Zaar, Kersten
- Other trademarks owned by Zaar, Kersten
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INVIZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 17, 2022 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |