Drawing for RED CELL

USPTO serial 76204715

RED CELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS AND GILBERT1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF ADVERTISING AND MARKETINGACTIVE—
035Business consultation, business research and business information services; all for advising businesses on the use of the digital media, telecommunications services, intranets, extranets, interactive television, CD-ROMs and mobile telephones; advertising services, namely, providing advertising space in periodicals and online-media; advertising agency services; direct marketing advertising services for others; promotional services, namely, preparing promotional and merchandising material for others; market research; market analysis; business marketing consulting services; procurement, namely, negotiating and purchasing advertising space and time; production of radio and television commercials; preparing advertisements for others; providing statistical information to businesses; business management; publicity agents; public relations; and data processing servicesACTIVE—
038Telecommunication and communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data, video, audio and documents via computer terminals; electronic mail servicesACTIVE—
041Training, teaching and educational services, namely, conducting seminars, conferences and workshops regarding the utilization of digital media in connection with the Internet, intranets, extranets, interactive television and mobile telephones for entertainment, amusement, recreation and cultural activities; training in the nature of seminars, conferences and workshops in the fields of advertising, marketing, business, public relations and communication; motion picture film production; videotape production; audio recording production; and training in the use of the InternetACTIVE—
042DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, GRAPHIC ART DESIGN, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND COMPUTER HARDWARE DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CONSULTATION THEREFOR; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; DESIGN OF NEW INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; WRITTEN TEXT EDITING AND PRINTING; INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; PACKAGING DESIGN FOR OTHERS; AND TECHNICAL ADVICE ON THE USE OF THE INTERNETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance