USPTO serial 76204850
CHANNEL CONNECTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2826849Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHANNEL CONNECTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARLENE J WILLIAMS
MARLENE J WILLIAMS THELEN REID BROWN RAYSMAN & STEINER LLPPO BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-0187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES FEATURING INFORMATION ON MARKET DEVELOPMENT, MARKETING COLLATERAL, SALES PRESENTATIONS, PRODUCT AND PRICING PROVIDED BY MEANS OF A MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM, ALL DIRECTED TO VALUE ADDED RESELLERS, SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS, PRODUCT INTEGRATORS, ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS, DISTRIBUTORS AND SOLUTIONS PROVIDERS, BUT EXCLUDING END USERS, OF WIRELESS DATA COMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PRODUCTS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |