Drawing for ROYAL ULTRAFRAME

USPTO serial 76204997

ROYAL ULTRAFRAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL ULTRAFRAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harriet E. Perkins

HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP18TH AND CHERRY STS1 LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6996

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal building materials, namely, conservatory glazing systems, composed of metal glazing bars, ridge beams, eaves beams, gutters, decorative panels and mouldings, crestings and finials sold as a unit; prefabricated aluminum conservatories, prefabricated aluminum glasshouses/greenhouses, aluminum components for receiving glazing, namely aluminum window frames, aluminum door frames, aluminum glazing bars, aluminum ridge beams, aluminum eaves beams, aluminum gutters, aluminum decorative panels and mouldings, aluminum crestings and finials; conservatory roof systems made primarily of metal, composed of glazing bars, ridge beams, eaves beams, decorative panels and mouldings, crestings and finials sold as a unit; replacement parts and fittings therefor for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
019Non-metal building materials, namely, conservatory glazing systems composed of glass or plastics glazing panels, glazing bars, ridge beams, eaves beams, gutters, decorative panels and moulding, crestings and finials sold as a unit; prefabricated non-metal conservatories, prefabricated non-metal glasshouses/greenhouses; non-metal components for receiving glazing, namely, non-metal window frames non-metal door frames, non-metal glazing bars, non-metal ridge beams, non-metal eaves beams, non-metal gutters, non-metal decorative panels and mouldings, non-metal crestings and finials, plastic roofing panels and translucent plastic roofing panels, non-metal conservatory roofing systems composted of glass or plastic roofing panels, glazing bars, ridge beams, eaves beams, gutters, sealing gaskets, decorative panels and mouldings, crestings and finials sold as a unit, replacement parts and fittings therefor for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 20011.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance