USPTO serial 76205001
GOLDEN NUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDEN NUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
Delegacion Alvaro Obregon 01210, MX
Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
Delegacion Alvaro Obregon 01210, MX
MEXICO CITY, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell N Rippamonti
RUSSELL N RIPPAMONTI, LINDA M NOVAK FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed peanuts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO BIMBO S .A . DE C .V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named GOLDEN NUTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |