CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for COMPUTERFLEET

USPTO serial 76205049

COMPUTERFLEET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTERFLEET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald T. Shekleton

GERALD T SHEKLETON WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE MONITORING, RECORDING AND MANAGING OF LEASED AND NON-LEASED ASSETSACTIVE—
035PROCUREMENT, NAMELY, PURCHASING OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, AND GENERAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT FOR OTHERS; AND MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, AND GENERAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MONITORING AND REPORTING ON THE WHEREABOUTS, USABILITY, AND DISPOSAL OF SUCH EQUIPMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 29, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance