USPTO serial 76205089
GAMECUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAMECUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kyoto, 601-8501, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD E NAGAE
JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING LODGING AND RESORT SERVICES; RESTAURANT SERVICES; PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES; OFFSET LITHOGRAPHY SERVICES; GRAVURE PRINTING; SCREEN PRINTING; LITHOGRAPHY SERVICES; RELIEF PRINTING SERVICES; COMPUTER PROGRAM DESIGN; TESTING OR RESEARCH RELATING TO MACHINES OR INSTRUMENTS; TESTING OR RESEARCH RELATING TO ELECTRICITY; COPYRIGHT INDUSTRY PROPERTY AGENCY CONSULTING SERVICES; VENDING MACHINE RENTAL; EXHIBITION FACILITIES RENTAL; RENTAL OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTATION; RENTAL OF ELECTRONIC COMPUTER AND VIDEO GAMES; ON-LINE RETAIL STORES FEATURING COMPUTER, ELECTRONIC, INTERACTIVE AND VIDEO GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |