USPTO serial 76205130
TOSTACHOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3159249Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOSTACHOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
Delegacion Alvaro Obregon, MX
DELEGACION ALVARO OBREGON, MX
DELEGACION ALVARO OBREGON, MX
MEXICO CITY, MX
Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
Delegacion Alvaro Obregon, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua S. Frick
Joshua S. Frick Brinks Gilson & LioneP.O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | fried corn snacks and fried wheat flour snacks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO BIMBO, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO BIMBO, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO BIMBO, S.A. B. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Central Impulsora, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TOSTACHOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |