Drawing for TERRASURFIN

USPTO serial 76205157

TERRASURFIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TERRASURFIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SEARCH ENGINE SOFTWARE FOR LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN SEARCHING, RETRIEVING, ACCESSING TO AND EDITING THE DATA INFORMATION STORED IN ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS INTERCONNECTED WITH THE LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS AND FOR USE IN PROVIDING USERS/CLIENTS WITH THE EDITED DATA INFORMATION VIA THE AFORESAID NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING THREE DIMENSIONAL MAPABANDONED—
038PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO THE LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKSABANDONED—
041PROVISION OF INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF CULTURE, EDUCATION, ART, MUSIC, SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT AND AMUSEMENT VIA LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKSABANDONED—
042Computer services, namely, providing information featuring a wide variety of topics of general interest to the consuming public, businesses, and private institutions via local and global computer information networksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 2, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 3, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance