USPTO serial 76205317
HYDRO INDUSTRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDRO INDUSTRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
23513 MIGDAL HAEMEK, IL
23513 MIGDAL HAEMEK, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M FRIEDMAN
MARK M FRIEDMAN BILL POLKINGHORN-DISCOVERY DISPATCHDR MARK FRIEDMAN LTD9003 FLORIN WAYUPPER MARLBORO, MD 20772Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | WATER-POWERED TOYS, NAMELY, ROTATING CAROUSEL, REVOLVING HELICOPTER WITH OR WITHOUT RIFLES, REVOLVING AIRPLANE WITH OR WITHOUT GUNS, BOAT WITH OPERATION, SPEED AND DIRECTION CONTROLLED BY HYDRAULIC LEVER, ROTATING CRANE WITH LEVER FOR RAISING AND LOWERING OBJECTS, ROTATING ROBOT WITH ARM FOR LIFTING AND MOVING OBJECTS, ROTATING SHOVEL WITH FULLY OPERATIONAL ARM FOR SHOVELING SAND AND SMALL OBJECTS, ROTATING CANON, BUGGY WITH OPERATION, SPEED AND DIRECTION CONTROLLED BY HYDRAULIC LEVER AND ROTATING AND MOVING PET ANIMALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |