USPTO serial 76205667
DECRANE AIRCRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DECRANE AIRCRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Coester
THOMAS M COESTER BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Upgrading and retrofitting of products for the corporate aircraft industry, namely, aircraft and cabin furnishings, lighting, communication systems, in-flight entertainment equipment, fuel tank systems and power units, cabin shells, sidewalls and partitions, audio-visual equipment, flight deck instrumentation and instrumentation display components, global positioning equipment and traffic collision avoidance equipment, avionics systems | ACTIVE | Feb 19, 1997 |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of products for the corporate aircraft industry, namely, aircraft and cabin furnishings, lighting, communication systems, in-flight entertainment equipment, fuel tank systems and power units, cabin shells, sidewalls and partitions, audio-visual equipment, flight deck instrumentation and instrumentation display components, global positioning equipment and traffic collision avoidance equipment, avionics systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Aircraft equipment design and aircraft interior design for the corporate aircraft industry, namely, developing and engineering aircraft and cabin furnishings, lighting, communication systems, in-flight entertainment equipment, fuel tank systems and power units, cabin shells, sidewalls and partitions, audio-visual equipment, flight deck instrumentation and instrumentation display components, global positioning equipment and traffic collision avoidance equipment, avionics systems; engineering services; product development services for others in the corporate aircraft industry; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others in the corporate aircraft industry for the purpose of certification | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |