Drawing for TRUBS

USPTO serial 76206209

TRUBS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUBS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARSHA G GENTNER

MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG STE 600400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028TOYS, NAMELY, DOLLS, DOLLHOUSES, DOLL CASES, DOLL FURNITURE, ACTION FIGURES AND CASES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, PLUSH TOYS, BATH TOYS, PUPPETS, CHILDREN MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, RIDE-ON TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, TOY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION BLOCKS, CHILDREN'S WIRE AND CONSTRUCTION AND ART ACTIVITY SETS, CONSTRUCTION TOYS, GAME TABLES, CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY TABLES CONTAINING MANIPULATIVE TOYS WHICH CONVERT TO EASELS, CUBE-TYPE, JIGSAW, AND MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, DOLL COSTUMES, COSTUME MASKS, BATTERY-POWERED COMPUTER GAME WITH LCD SCREEN WHICH FEATURES ANIMATION AND SOUND EFFECTS, BOARD GAMES, ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAME MACHINES FOR CHILDREN, AND MANIPULATIVE GAMESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 24, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance