USPTO serial 76206345
DYNASTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNASTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth Ortler
101 1ST ST STE 645LOS ALTOS, CA 94022-2750UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh fruits, raw fruits, and unprocessed fruits, excluding tomatoes; fresh vegetables, raw vegetables, and unprocessed vegetables, excluding cucumbers, cabbage, onions, lettuce, alfalfa, perennial ryegrass, timothy and tall fescue; fresh ginger, raw ginger, and unprocessed ginger; unprocessed grains for eating, excluding wheat and sweet corn; fresh nuts, raw nuts, and unprocessed nuts; fresh mushrooms, raw mushrooms, and unprocessed mushrooms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |