USPTO serial 76206358
CARBOPLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARBOPLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry Teitelbaum
PERRY TEITELBAUM GOODMAN & TEITELBAUM26 COURT ST STE 1400BROOKLYN, NY 11242-1114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | REFRACTORY MINERAL BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, REFRACTORY AND HEAT-RESISTANT BRICKS; REFRACTORY BATCHES FOR REFRACTORY LININGS, NAMELY, UNSHAPED REFRACTORY PRODUCTS COMPOSED OF REFRACTORY RAW MATERIALS AND BONDING AGENTS; REFRACTORY CONCRETE, MORTAR AND CEMENT; REFRACTORY, RESIN-BONDED BRICKS, NAMELY, MAGNESIA-CARBON-BRICKS, ALUMINA-CARBON-BRICKS, SPINEL-CARBON-BRICKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |