USPTO serial 76206694
SUPERSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Quinn
ANDREW QUINN SONY ELECTRONICS INC16530 VIA ESPRILLOMZ 7345SAN DIEGO, CA 92127Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | liquid crystal display data projectors for connection to local and wide area networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |