Drawing for TEXAS BREADER

USPTO serial 76206826

TEXAS BREADER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2896045Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 19, 2004
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEXAS BREADER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Cohen

ROBERT B COHEN LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & ME600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030FLOUR-BASED COATING FOR CHICKENSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDApr 12, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2006C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 3, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 28, 2006CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Aug 5, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 27, 2005COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 24, 2005AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 23, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 26, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance