USPTO serial 76207018
DIGITAL POWER MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2637680Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- JENNINGS, PATRICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIGITAL POWER MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce D Holloway
Bruce D Holloway Law Offices of Bruce D. HollowayP.O. Box 2059Dublin, CA 94568UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Manufacture to the order and/or to the specifications of others of electric and hybrid drive train systems composed of internal combustion engines, generators, electric motors, power controllers, inverters, software and firmware; energy management systems composed of an electric controller, batteries, chargers, software and firmware; storage systems composed of electric converters, inverters, software and firmware; and components for use in land vehicles and in marine applications, namely electrical controllers, electric converters, battery chargers, inverters, and accompanying computer software for use in the operation and control of electric and hybrid vehicle drive train systems, energy management systems, energy storage systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2000 |
| 042 | research and development of new products for others, design and testing of new products for others, and computer software consultation services and computer software design for others, all in the field of electric and hybrid drive systems for vehicular and nautical applications, energy management technologies for vehicular and nautical applications, and battery and fuel cell technologies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |