USPTO serial 76207176
OSMOZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OSMOZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GENEVA 8, CH
92200 Neuilly sur Seine, FR
92200 Neuilly sur Seine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milton M. Oliver, Reg. # 28,333
Milton M. Oliver, Reg. # 28,333 WARE FRESSOLA VDS & ADOLPHSONPO BOX 224; BRADFORD GREEN755 MAIN ST., BLDG. FIVEMONROE, CT 06468Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume; perfumery products, namely, toilet and scented water, musk and amber, essential oils and oils for use in the manufacture of perfumes and scents, incense, flower extracts used in the manufacture of scented perfume, scented wood, eau de Cologne, deodorants for personal use, sachets for perfuming linen, fragrance potpourris | ACTIVE | May 9, 2008 |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, leaflets, brochures, newsletters and printed publications, namely, books and daily, weekly and monthly newspapers and magazines all relating to business, current affairs, art, literature, science, travel, holidays, history, fashion, cooking, beauty, health, luxury goods, housekeeping and interior designing; stationery | ACTIVE | May 9, 2008 |
| 035 | Advertising, namely, distribution of samples, direct mail advertising, organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes in the nature of business, current affairs, art, literature, science, travel, holidays, history, fashion, cooking, beauty, health, luxury goods, housekeeping and interior designing; sales promotion for the goods of others in the nature of distribution of printed material and samples, of promotional contests and of sponsorship of art exhibitions and artists, charities and fashion shows, publication of publicity texts, public relations, marketing studies for others, shop window dressing, electronic billboard advertising in the nature of advertising banners on web sites and portals of others and on on-line newsletters of others | ACTIVE | May 9, 2008 |
| 038 | communications by means of transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet, via computer terminals, telecommunications services namely providing long distance service with audio advertising for others as a component of the long distance service, electronic mail services via the Internet | ACTIVE | May 9, 2008 |
| 041 | Education in the nature of providing of training in the field or use of business, current affairs, art, literature, science, travel, holidays, history, fashion, cooking, beauty, health, luxury goods, housekeeping and interior designing, entertainment and cultural activities, namely, providing museum facilities consisting of presentations and exhibitions pertaining to business, current affairs, art, literature, science, travel, holidays, history, fashion, cooking, beauty, health, luxury goods, housekeeping and interior designing, organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes, entertainment, namely, arranging and conducting of colloquiums, of conferences and of congresses pertaining to business, current affairs, art, literature, science, travel, holidays, history, fashion, cooking, beauty, health, luxury goods, housekeeping and interior designing, party planning, education or entertainment, namely, organization of competitions in the field of cooking, beauty, fashion, interior designing, literature, science and art; on-line electronic publication of books and of periodicals in the fields of business, current affairs, art, literature, science, travel, holidays, history, fashion, cooking, beauty, health, luxury goods, housekeeping and interior designing, providing on-line electronic non-downloadable publications, namely, books, newspapers and magazines in the field of business, current affairs, art, literature, science, travel, holidays, history, fashion, cooking, beauty, health, luxury goods, housekeeping and interior designing | ACTIVE | May 9, 2008 |
| 042 | Creating, setting up and hosting of web sites for others, consultancy in the field of perfumery, creating perfumes, expert services in the field of perfumery, creating perfumes, expert services in the field of perfumery | ACTIVE | May 9, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIRMENICH S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Osmoz
- Other trademarks owned by Osmoz
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OSMOZ
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |