USPTO serial 76207445
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, B.C., CA
HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS-WAVEMAKERS, INC.
VANCOUVER, CA
Other trademarks owned by HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS-WAVEMAKERS, INC.
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
NORTHRIDGE, CA
Other trademarks owned by HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
NORTHRIDGE, CA
Other trademarks owned by HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P Hart
ROBERT P HART HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC8500 BALBOA BLVDNORTHRIDGE, CA 91329UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that enables the analysis of acoustic or electronic signals from acoustic equipment and/or sources, namely, voice commands and user interfaces, telephones, recordings, cable, wireless transmissions, communication devices, and appliances, namely, hearing aids, computers and electronic embedded circuits in order to extract, manipulate and/or reconstruct speech and/or specified sounds; computer software that enables instructions and responses from an electronic embedded circuit by means of voice commands and user interface | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |