USPTO serial 76207446
CLEARSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEARSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS-WAVEMAKERS, INC.
VANCOUVER, CA
Other trademarks owned by HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS-WAVEMAKERS, INC.
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
NORTHRIDGE, CA
Other trademarks owned by HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
NORTHRIDGE, CA
Other trademarks owned by HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P Hart
ROBERT P HART HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC8500 BALBOA BLVDNORTHRIDGE, CA 91329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that analyzes acoustic or electronic signals from acoustic environments and/or sources, namely, voice commands and user interfaces, telephones, recordings, cable wireless transmissions, communication devices, and appliances, namely, hearing aids, computers and electronic embedded circuits in order to extract, manipulate and/or reconstruct speech and/or specified sounds; computer software that enables instructions and responses from an electronic embedded circuit by means of voice commands and user interface | ACTIVE | Dec 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS-WAVEMAKERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Wavemakers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CLEARSTREAM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |