USPTO serial 76207497
ZC.TV ZOOM CULTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZC.TV ZOOM CULTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chapel Hill, NC
Chapel Hill, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Jose Cortina
A JOSE CORTINA KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP3737 GLENWOOD AVE STE 400RALEIGH, NC 27612-5515UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Interactive and multimedia entertainment, namely, providing interactive and audio visual television programs for others over a global computer network; distribution of audio visual and interactive television programs for others over the global computer network; educational services, namely conducting tutorials in the field of media production and distributing class materials in the form of compact discs in connection therewith and over the global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing news and information about topics of general interest over the global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |