Drawing for IQNETWORK

USPTO serial 76207549

IQNETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IQNETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A LAVINE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CD-ROMS FOR USE IN MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, FEATURING INTERACTIVE COMMUNITIES, INTERACTIVE MANAGEMENT SIMULATIONS, PROGRAMS, COURSES AND WORKSHOPS, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS PROJECT MANAGEMENT, SALES TRAINING, BUSINESS ACUMEN, E-BUSINESS, EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT, PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, COACHING, AND MENTOR TRAININGACTIVE—
016PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS FOR USE IN CONSULTING SERVICES, FEATURING INTERACTIVE COMMUNITIES, INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS, PROGRAMS, COURSES AND WORKSHOPS, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS PROJECT MANAGEMENT, SALES TRAINING, BUSINESS ACUMEN, E-BUSINESS, EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT, PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, COACHING, AND MENTOR TRAININGACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED VIA THE INTERNET, NAMELY, CONDUCTING PROGRAMS, COURSES, WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS PROJECT MANAGEMENT, SALES TRAINING, BUSINESS ACUMEN, E-BUSINESS, EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT, PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, COACHING, AND MENTOR TRAININGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 21, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 19, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 8, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance