USPTO serial 76207565
TICK TAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TICK TAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Marsh
ROBERT E MARSH CORPORATE COUNSEL GROUP LLP4144 PENNSYLVANIA AVEKANSAS CITY, MO 64111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Hand tool for removing inserts attached to human or animal hosts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |