USPTO serial 76207696
WAVPOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAVPOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software featuring pre-recorded audio clips of sound and music for use in computers, telephones, cell phones, personal digital assistants and other electronic devices; multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring audio clips of sound and music for use in computers, telephones, cell phones, personal digital assistants and other electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail services in the field of pre-recorded audio clips of sound and music for further use in computers, telephones, cell phones, personal digital assistants, and other electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Audio broadcasting of sounds and music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mikkelsen, John P.
- Other trademarks owned by Mikkelsen, John P.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named WAVPOP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |