Drawing for OLD DELICIOUS

USPTO serial 76207738

OLD DELICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLD DELICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth S Klarquist

KENNETH S KLARQUIST KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL LEIGHONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 SW SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033distilled spiritsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 28, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 26, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 28, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 28, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 5, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 7, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 5, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance