Drawing for NOURICEL PATENTED. PURE.

USPTO serial 76207800

NOURICEL PATENTED. PURE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOURICEL PATENTED. PURE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Munson

Peter Munson Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati12235 El Camino Real Suite 200San Diego, CA 92130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetic creams and lotions, namely, creams and lotions to diminish wrinkles and rejuvenate the appearance of the skin; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of topical agents, wound care and skin regeneration products; and chemical additives for use in the manufacture of hair, scalp, nail, and cuticle care products; chemicals for use as a conditioned medium for stimulating cell growth and metabolism for scientific or medical research purposesACTIVE—
003Cosmetic creams and lotions; hair care preparations, scalp preparations, nail and cuticle creams; cuticle removing preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 16, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 16, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance