USPTO serial 76207821
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anmnda E. Pccchioni
ANMNDA E PCCCHIONI BARNES & THORNBURG11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for videotape to DVD conversion, and transfer of digital videotapes to other DVDs, videotapes, and any new video standard; scene indexing; video streaming; video mail; high resolution still (SP) photos for video; video special effects, namely with still (SP) photos | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2001 |
| 041 | providing services in the field of video editing, namely for the conversion of videotape to DVD, and transfer of digital video tape to other DVDs, videotapes, and other new video standard; scene indexing, video streaming; video mail; high resolution still (SP) photos for video; video special effects; preservation, storage, and copying of video; and, providing assistance with video editing via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |