USPTO serial 76208111
ZODIAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZODIAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Worli, Mumbai - 400 018, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
PETER M DE JONGETHORPE N & W ERN LLPP O BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, excluding T-shirts; namely shirts; neckties, boas, braces; collars, cuffs; pants, trousers; coats, suits overcoats, blazers, jerseys, jackets, shorts, bermudas; sweaters, shawls; headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |