USPTO serial 76208147
Serial No. 76208147
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3068524Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76208147?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
"WIMM-BILL-DANN BRANDS CO. LTD."
MOSCOW, RU
OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY "WIMM-BILL-DANN FOODS"
MOSCOW, RU
Other trademarks owned by OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY "WIMM-BILL-DANN FOODS"
OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY "WIMM-BILL-DANN FOODS"
MOSCOW, RU
Other trademarks owned by OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY "WIMM-BILL-DANN FOODS"
OBSCHESTVO S OGRANICHENNOY OTVETSTVENNOSTYU "EKSPERIMENTALNOYE OBYEDINENIYE "ISSA"
MOSCOW 103460, RU
OBSCHESTVO S OGRANICHENNOY OTVETSTVENNOSTYU "EKSPERIMENTALNOYE OBYEDINENIYE "ISSA"
MOSCOW 103460, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Silverberg
Janet Silverberg PepsiCo, Inc.7701 Legacy DriveMail Stop 3A-421Plano, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | aerated water, lemonades, fruit juices, fruit drinks, fruit punch, and fruit flavored soft drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "WIMM-BILL-DANN BRANDS CO. LTD."
- Other trademarks owned by OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY "WIMM-BILL-DANN FOODS"
- Other trademarks owned by OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY "WIMM-BILL-DANN FOODS"
- Other trademarks owned by OBSCHESTVO S OGRANICHENNOY OTVETSTVENNOSTYU "EKSPERIMENTALNOYE OBYEDINENIYE "ISSA"
- Other trademarks owned by OBSCHESTVO S OGRANICHENNOY OTVETSTVENNOSTYU "EKSPERIMENTALNOYE OBYEDINENIYE "ISSA"
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |