USPTO serial 76208203
RED VELVET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED VELVET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Leeton, NSW 2705, AU
Leeton, NSW 2705, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Morris Jr
RICHARD L MORRIS JR C/O 1-800-4-TRADEMARKP O BOX 398538MIAMI BEACH, FL 33239-8538UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine, excluding wine made from plums, apricots or plumcots | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |