USPTO serial 76208259
FENG SHUI FOR MODERN LIVING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FENG SHUI FOR MODERN LIVING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H. GELLER
JAY H GELLERW TWR STE 4000W OLYMPIC BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines, periodicals and books concerning interior design, lifestyle, health and general interest subjects relating to the ancient Chinese art, science and philosophy of Feng Shui | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting trade shows featuring the ancient Chinese art, science and philosophy of Feng Shui | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting seminars featuring the ancient Chinese art, science and philosophy of Feng Shui | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goodman Media Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Goodman Media Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FENG SHUI FOR MODERN LIVING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |