USPTO serial 76208318
INDIEREV PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3127220Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INDIEREV PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded compact discs and phonograph records featuring music; prerecorded audio cassettes and tapes, prerecorded video cassettes and tapes, all featuring music; multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM in the area of music; musical video recordings; motion picture films featuring drama, music, comedy, musicals; exposed camera film and camera film negatives containing motion pictures and television movies featuring drama, music, comedy, documentaries, news, musical, and comedy performances; laser discs featuring dramatic motion pictures, comedy, and musicals; videotapes featuring dramatic motion pictures, comedy, and musicals; musical sound recordings; Downloadable musical sound recordings; downloadable video recordings featuring dramatic motion pictures, comedy, and musicals; downloadable audio recordings featuring drama, and comedy; computer games programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 25, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |