USPTO serial 76208434
GYRL CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GYRL CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
PLZ 9900 RTE 9 NWOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095-1003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | INTIMATE APPAREL, NAMELY, BRAS, CROP TOPS, BIKINI UNDERWEAR, PANTIES, SLIPS, NIGHTGOWNS, CAMI SETS, AND PACKAGED UNDERWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |