Drawing for HERBAL LOGIX

USPTO serial 76208468

HERBAL LOGIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3117453Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2006
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HERBAL LOGIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan F. Evans

Susan F. Evans % Henkel of America, Inc.19001 N. Scottsdale RoadLegal Dept., M.S. 04.50Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY SKIN MOISTURIZERS AND LOTIONS; FACIAL AND SKIN CLEANSING PREPARATIONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 31, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jan 14, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 2, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 26, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 26, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 6, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 6, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 6, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 30, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 3, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance