Drawing for LIGHTHANDLER

USPTO serial 76208470

LIGHTHANDLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHTHANDLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucy B. Arant

LUCY B ARANT RUSS AUGUST KABAT & KENT12424 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1052UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH APPLICANT'S OPTICAL NETWORK SWITCHING AND TRANSPORT COMPUTER SYSTEMS TO ENABLE AND MANAGE NETWORK SWITCHINGACTIVE—
037INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES LIMITED EXCLUSIVELY TO SUPPORT THE RETURN AND REPAIR OF APPLICANT'S OPTICAL NETWORKING SWITCHING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWAREACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, TRAINING EXCLUSIVELY LIMITED TO THE OPERATION OF APPLICANT'S OPTICAL NETWORK SWITCHING AND TRANSPORT SYSTEMSACTIVE—
042ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, EXCLUSIVELY LIMITED TO APPLICANT'S ELEMENT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE SYSTEMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 22, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance