Drawing for TIME-TO-REVENUE DESIGN ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76208969

TIME-TO-REVENUE DESIGN ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TIME-TO-REVENUE DESIGN ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M Brody

PETER M BRODY ROPES & GRAY1301 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3317UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for the design, development and testing of integrated circuits and electronic systems in the fields of telecommunications, computers and networkingACTIVE—
035Engineering consulting services, namely, the design, verification, integration, customization, testing and implementation of computer hardware, software and firmware, and the evaluation, integration, support and development of complex integrated circuits and systems-on-chip in the fields of telecommunications, computers and networking; Business consulting services, namely, computer hardware, software, and firmware evaluation and strategy development for others in the fields of telecommunications, computers and networking; licensing of computer hardware, software and firmware in the fields of telecommunications, computers and networkingACTIVE—
037Computer hardware and firmware maintenance, training, support and call center services in the fields of telecommunications, computers and networkingACTIVE—
042Licensing of intellectual property in the fields of telecommunications, computers and networking; computer software maintenance, training, support and call center services in the fields of telecommunications, computers and networkingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 30, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 19, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 15, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance