USPTO serial 76209092
VIRTUAL AROMA SYNTHESIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL AROMA SYNTHESIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1214 Vernier, CH
1214 Vernier, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J Josephic
DAVID J JOSEPHIC DAVID J JOSEPHIC WOOD HERRON EVENS LLP2700 CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Product research and development for others in the areas of aromas and aroma chemicals to identify and develop aromas and aroma chemicals for augmenting, enhancing and imparting fragrances to cosmetics and perfumes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |