USPTO serial 76209168
CLASSROOM PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLASSROOM PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry W. Sufrin
BARRY W SUFRIN MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1900CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Teaching apparatus, teaching instruments and hands-on educational manipulative products for children for mathematical and scientific purposes, namely, scales and balances, measuring weights, tape measures, abacuses, measuring spoons, measuring cups, measuring beakers, measuring jars, thermometers not for medical use, protractors, pre-recorded audio tapes and video tapes featuring mathematics and science for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Drawing and drafting instruments; drafting compasses, drafting rulers and drafting triangles; printed manuals and instruction sheets for the use of manipulatives for mathematics instruction; mathematics workbooks and teaching manuals; hands-on manipulatives for mathematics instruction, namely, flash cards and printed clock faces for educational use; origami paper; templates for drawing and drafting, paper and plastic transparencies that include plastic manipulatives; rubber stamps; printed number boards; lettering guides; posters for teaching temperature concepts; office requisites, namely, rubber bands | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Mathematical teaching and learning manipulative games utilizing one or more toy manipulatives, namely, plastic beads, colored plastic tiles and colored plastic stacking chips cubes, pegs, blocks, geometric solids, disks, counters, nuts and bolts, chain links, playing cards, animal figures, play money, learning clocks, spinners, dice, dominoes, marbles; kits comprised of manipulative games and printed materials for teaching mathematics to children; toy peg boards; manipulative strategy games; construction toys; manipulative games; manipulative puzzles; dice; card games; marbles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |