Drawing for JETTENDO.COM

USPTO serial 76209314

JETTENDO.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JETTENDO.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY LAW OFFICE OF JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MC LEAN, VA 22101-5726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Electronic retail store services featuring medical devicesACTIVESep 19, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 5, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 5, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 4, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 14, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance